FUNDRAISINGfundraisingseed stage

Bridge Rounds: When They Save Companies and When They Kill Them

40% of seed-stage companies raised a bridge in 2025. Some used it to reach escape velocity. Others just delayed the inevitable. How to know which camp you're in.

LF
Lena FischerPartner, Northzone
April 1, 2025
7 min read

Bridge rounds were once a signal of distress. In 2025, they've become a standard part of the funding lifecycle — roughly 40% of seed-funded companies in our portfolio raised a bridge between seed and Series A. But the outcomes are bimodal: bridge rounds either catapult companies to their next milestone or they extend the runway to nowhere.

When a Bridge Saves a Company

Bridges work when the company has a clear, specific milestone that additional capital will help them reach — and that milestone will meaningfully change their fundraising position. The best bridges I've seen share three characteristics:

  • The milestone is specific and measurable: '$2M ARR' or '120% NRR' — not 'more traction'
  • The existing investors are participating (signals continued conviction)
  • The timeline to milestone is 6–9 months (longer bridges usually mean the milestone is too far away)

When a Bridge Kills a Company

Bridges become destructive when they substitute for hard strategic decisions. If a company can't raise a Series A because the metrics aren't there, a bridge that doesn't change the trajectory just adds more people to the cap table who will be disappointed later.

I've seen bridges that gave founders the runway to find product-market fit and raise a great Series A. I've also seen bridges that gave founders 12 more months of hoping something would change. The difference is whether the founder has a specific plan for what the bridge money will do.

Lena Fischer

Structuring the Bridge

Most bridges in 2025 are structured as SAFEs or convertible notes with a 15–20% discount to the next round. The key terms to negotiate carefully:

  1. 1.Valuation cap — set it at or slightly above your last round's valuation. A high cap signals unrealistic expectations.
  2. 2.Conversion terms — make sure the bridge converts automatically at the next priced round. Manual conversion creates complexity.
  3. 3.Participation rights — existing investors should have pro-rata rights but shouldn't be forced to participate.
  4. 4.Information rights — bridge investors at this stage should get monthly updates but not board seats.
HONEST QUESTION

Before raising a bridge, ask yourself: 'If I had 6 more months of runway at my current burn rate, what specific metric would change?' If you can't answer that clearly, the bridge won't solve your problem — a strategic pivot or an honest conversation with your board will.

About the author
LF

Lena Fischer

Partner, Northzone

Lena leads Northzone's AI and infrastructure practice, having invested in 15 AI-native companies since 2023. She previously built ML infrastructure at Google DeepMind.

All articles
Weekly dispatch

Get more like this.

One email per week. Tactical insights from founders and investors in the Inner Ping community.